Is this an example of the free market of ideas? why or why not?
It is not a typical tpye of the free market of ideas because the court still involved in the case. A free market of ideas should be carry on without the outside regulations and interference.
Does/would FMI work here? Why or why not?
The FMI certainly did not work here because the businessman was defamed, and the general public starts to believe in the inaccurate informations. So the truth did not come to light.
No comments:
Post a Comment